UTTER QUACK
← All debunks
QUACK.

Blame the Throne, Not the Chromosome

Men Start All Wars

Canard rating3/5

The canard

All wars have been started by men.

Someone tell Catherine the Great, who annexed Crimea by force and drove Russia's wars of conquest. The honest version: wars are started by whoever holds power — and for most of history that was men because they kept women off the throne, not because of a chromosome.

The receipts

'All wars have been started by men' mistakes who held power for what causes war. Wars are launched by states and rulers, and rulers were overwhelmingly men because men monopolized political and military office and shut women out — not because maleness causes war. Women who did reach power launched and led wars too, and the real drivers of war are political and structural. It's a tidy slogan that collapses on a single counterexample.

  1. 1

    Wars are declared by states and the people who run them — and for nearly all of recorded history those people were men, because men monopolized political and military office and barred women from power (most women could not even vote until the 20th century). So 'the war-starters were men' describes who was permitted to hold power, not a property of the male sex. Correlation with a throne is not causation by a chromosome.

  2. 2

    'All' is doing the heavy lifting, and it is false: women who reached power have started and led wars across history. Catherine the Great waged aggressive wars of imperial conquest — forcibly annexing Crimea in 1783 and driving Russia's territorial expansion at the Ottomans' and Poland's expense; Boudica led a massive war against Roman Britain; and in modern times leaders such as Indira Gandhi and Margaret Thatcher led their nations through wars. One woman starting one war already breaks the rule — and there are many.

  3. 3

    War has causes, and 'maleness' is not one historians or political scientists list. Wars are traced to power and territory, resources, security fears, ideology, religion and economics — the situations states find themselves in, not the hormones of whoever signs the declaration. 'Men are just innately warlike' is an essentialist just-so story, and pinning a species-wide behaviour on one sex is exactly the kind of group caricature this project exists to flag.

Sources

  1. [1]Women's suffrageWikipediaDocuments that women were broadly excluded from the vote and from political office until the 19th-20th centuries — i.e. men held political and military power not by nature but because women were shut out of it.
  2. [2]Catherine the GreatWikipediaEmpress of Russia (r. 1762-1796) whose reign drove major territorial expansion — the forcible 1783 annexation of Crimea, plus Russia's gains in the Russo-Turkish wars and the partitions of Poland — a woman head of state waging wars of conquest. (The 1768-74 war was Ottoman-declared and the Poland partitions were a joint, Prussian-initiated scheme; the clearest case of Catherine starting a war of aggression is the 1783 Crimean annexation.)
  3. [3]BoudicaWikipediaQueen of the Iceni who led a large-scale war/uprising against the Roman occupation of Britain c. 60-61 CE — a woman initiating and commanding a major war.
  4. [4]Indira GandhiWikipediaPrime Minister of India who led the country through the 1971 Indo-Pakistani War — a modern example of a woman leader prosecuting a war.
  5. [5]War (nature and causes)Encyclopaedia BritannicaOverview of the causes and theories of war — political, economic, territorial, ideological and structural factors — none of which reduce war to the sex of the decision-maker. (Britannica blocks automated scrapers but resolves normally in a browser.)

More canards to send

This page debunks a false claim using sourced evidence. The target is the claim — never any person or community. Sources are linked above so you can verify every point yourself.